gamerwithamonocle:
“ This is going to be FUN FUN FUN!
Sam Riegel is an enigma of a man who can simultaneously make you love him and want to punch him. Cheers to the stellar roll playing this week!
P.S. anyone know how to submit fanart to Critical...

gamerwithamonocle:

This is going to be FUN FUN FUN!

Sam Riegel is an enigma of a man who can simultaneously make you love him and want to punch him. Cheers to the stellar roll playing this week!

P.S. anyone know how to submit fanart to Critical Role?

shinyfurret:
“AHHH THANK YOU SO SO SO MUCH WHOEVER GOT ME THESE SHOES IVE WANTED TJEM FOR AN ETERNITY AND I CANT STOP CHANGING THE LIGHT SETTINGS!!! AHDJS I LOVE THEM!!!! ;u; ♥
”

shinyfurret:

AHHH THANK YOU SO SO SO MUCH WHOEVER GOT ME THESE SHOES IVE WANTED TJEM FOR AN ETERNITY AND I CANT STOP CHANGING THE LIGHT SETTINGS!!! AHDJS I LOVE THEM!!!! ;u; ♥

viergacht:

jhameia:

driftingfocus:

anogoodrabblerouser:

disquietingtruths:

universalequalityisinevitable:

Robert Sapolsky about his study of the Keekorok baboon troop from National Geographic’s Stress: Portrait of a Killer.

Thiiiiiiis, people, thiiiis!

1. Kill alpha male types
2. Achieve world peace

Got it.

I’ve actually read a lot of Sapolsky’s work.  He’s one of my favorite scientists in the neuro/socio world.

I just watched the documentary and there is so much more about the troop that isn’t in this photoset—not only does the troop have a culture of little aggression and greater cooperation, but any incoming jerk baboons learned within a few months that their shitty behaviour was in no way acceptable, that the troop only rewarded sociability, and they changed accordingly. 

If effin’ baboons can learn this there’s pretty much no reason to believe that our only option in dealing with assholes is to just ignore their behaviour and let it continue.

It’s backed up by other studies. For example, there was one where monkeys of a typically aggressive species were raised by foster mothers of a more chill species, and as adults they were conspicuously less aggressive than normal - clearly, that was a cultural trait and not a genetic one.

Also, who could argue with such a magnificent mane of hair?

(via sashaforthewin)

D&D Class Valentines

basalt-dnd:

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image

In alphabetical order, top to bottom:

Artificer, Bard, Barbarian, Druid, Fighter, Monk, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, Warlock, Wizard

My apologies that I don’t have the image credits (though I do know that several are from the 5e DMG). It’s been a while since I started putting these together. If there are any issues, or you know the image source, please let me know!

sarcastic-monkeys:
“thebutterghost:
“ glenn-griffon:
“ the-walking-tardis:
“ castiel-knight-of-hell:
xtheycallmeslimshadyx:
“ problematic-url:
“ basilsilos:
“ pennman9000:
“ dil-howlters-uncreative-username:
“ WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND
”
So...

sarcastic-monkeys:

thebutterghost:

glenn-griffon:

the-walking-tardis:

castiel-knight-of-hell:

xtheycallmeslimshadyx:

problematic-url:

basilsilos:

pennman9000:

dil-howlters-uncreative-username:

WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND

So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist.

reblogging for the last comment

Yes

Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality?

That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely. 

The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb. 

The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us.

This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr. 

!!!!!!!!!!!!!IMPORTANTHOLYSHIT!!!!!!!!

THANK YOU

(via kaikatsuna-yane)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk